حلقۂ علومِ دینیہ
Uloom-e-Diniya
the discipline itself — foundations, classical corpus, and the question of whether a jadeed ilm-ul-kalam is an emotional slogan or a real intellectual necessity — ending in two strategic frameworks: how to prove Islamic doctrine at the highest contemporary academic standard, and how to refute what contradicts it.
دائرہ کار
Foundations and history of ilm al-kalam; its relation to philosophy, logic and 'aqidah; classical mutakallimun; the philosophical schools that shaped and were opposed by kalam; the classical corpus (Tahāfut, Al-Radd); the contemporary reconstruction debate; assessment of present-day efforts; and two strategic frameworks (proof and refutation).
خارج الدائرہ
Object of this حلقہ: the religious sciences — عقائد و کلام, and (per the 2026-09-03 broadening) تفسیر, حدیث, فقہ و اصولِ فقہ and سیرت.
Outside it:
- The internal history of Western philosophy — that is حلقۂ تاریخِ فلسفہ.
- The empirical content of the natural sciences — that is حلقۂ طبیعیات, which supplies the آفاق material into the kalam.
- Modern symbolic logic as a discipline — that is حلقۂ ریاضی و منطق. Classical منطق belongs here; that حلقہ builds the bridge between them.
- Modern psychology — that is حلقۂ نفسیات.
- Educational system design — that is حلقۂ نظامِ تعلیم.
Provisional boundaries for the newly added territory (drafted 2026-09-03; the cross-stream map predates the broadening and has no zone for these):
- تفسیر: this حلقہ owns تفسیر as a discipline — اصولِ تفسیر, the schools, the mufassirīn. Every other حلقہ uses تفسیر instrumentally for its own domain, as دفعہ ۴. ۴ of the نظام العمل requires. In particular حلقۂ نفسیات works the نفس verses for psychological reconstruction without owning the discipline.
- حدیث: this حلقہ owns the hadith sciences — اصولِ حدیث, رجال, criticism. حلقۂ نظامِ تعلیم draws on prophetic pedagogy as source material without owning them.
- فقہ و اصولِ فقہ: legal theory sits here. حکمتِ احکام — the rationale of rulings — is a separate, still-unowned domain, and is not absorbed by this حلقہ.
- سیرت: unresolved. Seerah is a domain HeS still needs. Whether it falls inside علومِ دینیہ or remains a separate حلقہ is not yet decided.
Working syllabus
Twelve working headings, in the author's order and his own English rendering:
| # | Heading |
|---|---|
| 1 | Foundations of Ilm al-Kalām — historical development, subject matter, objectives and purposes, intellectual orientations, and scholarly dimensions |
| 2 | The interrelationship between Philosophy, Logic, ʿIlm al-ʿAqīdah and Ilm al-Kalām |
| 3 | A critical and analytical study of the fundamental premises and detailed discussions of Ilm al-Kalām |
| 4 | Classical Muslim philosophers and theologians (*mutakallimūn*) — biographical profiles, methodologies, intellectual journeys, scholarly influence |
| 5 | A critical examination of the schools of philosophy and logic that influenced *Ilm al-Kalām* — foundational principles, objections, key figures, intellectual impact |
| 6 | An analytical study of the most significant classical works, including Tahāfut al-Falāsifah and Al-Radd ʿalā al-Manṭiqiyyīn |
| 7 | The reconstruction of contemporary *Ilm al-Kalām*: an unfounded emotional proposition, or a genuine intellectual necessity? — or, a comparative study of classical and contemporary kalam |
| 8 | Contemporary *Ilm al-Kalām* — characteristics, methodology, core discussions, intended audiences, foundational principles, intellectual orientations, scholarly dimensions |
| 9 | A critical assessment of contemporary reconstruction efforts — leading scholars, major works, methodological approaches, key findings |
| 10 | Islam, Philosophy and Science in the context of Modernity |
| 11 | Formulating a strategic framework for the rational demonstration of established Islamic doctrines at the highest contemporary academic level |
| 12 | Formulating a strategic framework for the effective refutation of contemporary ideas and ideologies that are actually or potentially incompatible with the teachings of Islam |
Core canon
### Arabic
### Urdu
### English The Cambridge Companion to Classical Islamic Theology (ed. Tim Winter) · Tim Winter Islamic Theology · Umar S. al-Ashqar Islamic Creed Series · Majid Fakhry A History of Islamic Philosophy and Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Mysticism · Richard M. Frank Classical Islamic Theology: The Ash'arites · Frank Griffel Al-Ghazali's Philosophical Theology and *The Formation of Post-Classical Philosophy in Islam · Sabine Schmidtke (ed. ) The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology · Goldziher & Lewis Theology and Creed in Sunni Islam · Iqbal The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam · Eric L. Ormsby Islam and the Problem of Evil · Basil Altaie Islam, Science and Religion · Shoaib Ahmed Malik Islam and Evolution · Gai Eaton Islam and the Destiny of Man · Pervez Hoodbhoy Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality · S. H. Nasr Islamic Philosophy from its Origin to the Present*
Key thinkers
al-Ghazālī · Ibn Taymiyyah · Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī · al-Taftāzānī · al-Ījī · al-Shahrastānī · al-Baghdādī · Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār · al-Būṭī · al-Jābirī · Shiblī Nuʿmānī · Muhammad Qutb · Khālid Sayfullāh Rahmānī · Iqbal · Griffel · Fakhry · Shoaib Ahmed Malik · Basil Altaie.
Courses and resources
- AIOU — فلسفہ اور علم الکلام, MA (علومِ اسلامیہ), units 1–9, course code 2628
- Princeton University — Introduction to Islamic Theology
- Leiden University — Modern Islamic Theology
- المذاهب الإسلامية في علم الكلام — د. حسن خليل رضا
- City of Knowledge — Ilm ul Kalam and Modern Philosophy
Connection to Nashat-e-Sania
Direct and stated in the epigraph: forceful refutation of atheism and materialism, reasoned demonstration of Islamic doctrine — quoted from کرنے کا اصل کام itself. Headings 11–12 are the operational form of that sentence.
← All circles
Halqa-e-Shaheen